Legal Opinion
Cross Armored Carrier Corp. v. Valentine
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
Plaintiff Cross Armored Carrier Corp. is engaged in the business of transporting, by armored cars, money belonging to persons and corporations with whom it has contracts for such service.
*918It brings this action on two policies to recover a loss of $77,648.58. On the first printed page of each of the two Lloyd’s policies the defendants agree to indemnify the plaintiff, as the assured, in accordance with specific percentages (totalling 100%) for the loss covered thereby. The remainder of the policies is typewritten. Attached to the first typewritten page appears a rider which reads as follows:
ALL…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
- VanMinos v. MerkleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Board of Education of Brookhaven-Comsewogue Union Free School District v. Port Jefferson Station Teachers Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CassinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992