Legal Opinion

Criscuolo v. Moore Farms, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1972No. Appeal, 713PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

Defendant appeals from the order of the court below, discharging its rule to open a default judgment entered for failure to file an answer to plaintiffs’ complaint. The determinative question in this case is whether the defendant established a sufficient excuse for the default. The lower court found defendant’s excuse insufficient, and we cannot reverse this finding unless it represents a clear, manifest abuse of discretion. Walters v. Harleysville Mut. Cas. Co., 417 Pa. 438, 207 A.2d 852 (1965). Such an abuse of discretion has not been shown in this case.

The asserted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walters v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Colacioppo Et Ux. v. HolcombeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Weiner v. Cassin Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Spilove v. Cross Transportation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Slott v. Triad Distributors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Matyas v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Samuel Jacobs Distributors, Inc. v. Conditioned Air, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Johnson v. MulhallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API