Legal Opinion
Andrew A. Accardo v. Nicole DiPasquale, et al.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 27, 2026No. 2:25-cv-16768Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANDREW A. ACCARDO, Civil Action No. 25-16768 (JXN)(AME) Plaintiff, v. OPINION NICOLE DIPASQUALE, et al., Defendants. NEALS, District Judge Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Andrew A. Accardo’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint (ECF No. 1) and application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 1-1). The Court has reviewed the IFP Application and screened Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the IFP Application and DISMISSES the Complaint. I. BACKGROUND This action arises from…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.