Legal Opinion

Plant v. Heraty

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1902No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Bay; Shepard, J. Case by Daniel Plant against Michael P. Heraty and John C. Weadock, receivers of the Bay Cities Consolidated Street-Railway Company, for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff, a farmer, while driving north on Saginaw street, crossing Center street, in Bay City, was struck by a street-railway car. This suit was brought to recover damages for the injuries he received. After the witnesses for plaintiff had been sworn, and before any proof had been offered by defendants, the circuit judge directed a verdict in favor of defendants. The case is brought here by writ of error. ■

The city ordinance, under which the street cars were allowed to run, required the cars to be equipped with a suitable alarm bell, which was to be rung at least 50 feet from each…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rouse v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Tunison v. WeadockMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Edwards v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rouse v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API