Legal Opinion

Hotboxxx, LLC v. City of Gulfport, Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 2015No. 2013-CA-00939-SCTPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. At issue in the instant dispute is whether The Hotboxxx, LLC, has standing, to bring suit challenging the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance passed by the City of Gulfport. Hotboxxx claims that the chancery court erred by finding it had submitted an invalid privilege license application and that, regardless of the invalid license application, it has standing to sue. The City of Gulfport maintains that the application was incomplete and invalid; therefore, Hotboxxx does not have standing. Because Hotboxxx did not properly file an application and because…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. McNeil v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Dunaway v. WH Hopper & Associates, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Schmidt v. Catholic Diocese of BiloxiMississippi Supreme Court · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dalton Trigg v. Steven Farese, Sr.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  2. James D. Hobson, Jr. v. Chase Home Finance, L.L.C.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  3. John Davis v. City of Jackson, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Bennett v. Highland Park Apartments, LLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  5. John R. Armstrong v. Terry L. ArmstrongMississippi Supreme Court · 2015

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API