Walter Smith v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant was indicted and convicted for violating the marihuana statutes. 26 U.S.C. §§ 4742(a), 4744(a), 68A Stat. 560, 562. An expert witness testified that certain cigarettes which appellant sold “contained marihuana” and that “Cannabis sativa is marihuana.” The statute provides that “The term ‘marihuana’ means all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds, or resin; but shall not include the mature…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- McKelvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Sonzinsky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- New Hampshire Hemp Council, Inc. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- William Caldwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Doggett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- United States v. White PlumeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.