Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harlan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 2019No. 1592 MDA 2018PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY MURRAY, J.:

Jeremy Todd Harlan (Appellant) appeals pro se 1 from the judgment of sentence *499 imposed after the trial court convicted him of crimes committed under The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, 35 P.S. §§ 780-101 to 780-144, and The Uniform Firearms Act, 18 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 6101 - 6128. 2 On appeal, Appellant challenges the denial of his suppression motion. After careful consideration, we affirm.

Appellant summarizes his argument as follows:

The affidavit of probable cause contained hearsay and inadmissible and unsubstantiated double-hearsay with no eyewitnesses,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. GrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Com. v. Kurtz, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  2. Com. v. Carey, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Com. v. Wright, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Com. v. Kurtz, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Camacho, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API