Commonwealth v. Harlan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY MURRAY, J.:
Jeremy Todd Harlan (Appellant) appeals pro se 1 from the judgment of sentence *499 imposed after the trial court convicted him of crimes committed under The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, 35 P.S. §§ 780-101 to 780-144, and The Uniform Firearms Act, 18 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 6101 - 6128. 2 On appeal, Appellant challenges the denial of his suppression motion. After careful consideration, we affirm.
Appellant summarizes his argument as follows:
The affidavit of probable cause contained hearsay and inadmissible and unsubstantiated double-hearsay with no eyewitnesses,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Com. v. Kurtz, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. Carey, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Wright, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Kurtz, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. Camacho, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.