Borough v. Steiner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 13, Oct. T., 1901, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Lancaster Co., Equity Docket No. 3, page 335, granting a preliminary injunction in case of Washington Borough v. Albert and Margaret Steiner. Bill in equity to restrain an encroachment on an alleged highway. Before LmuesTOE, P. J. The facts sufficiently appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
The record shows that on September 10, 1900, the plaintiff’s bill and injunction affidavits were filed; that on the same day the president judge awarded a preliminary injunction returnable on September 15; that on the last mentioned date the defendants filed an answer; that testimony was taken; and that on December 8, the court entered the following decree : “ Having therefore fully examined the case as presented, and finding no sufficient reason, we refuse the motion to dissolve, and hereby direct the injunction heretofore granted in this case to continue until further…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fredericks v. HuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Audenried v. Philadelphia & Reading RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Cooke v. BoyntonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Whiteman v. Fayette Fuel-Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Fidelity Etc. Co. v. West. Penn. Etc. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Taylor v. SauerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- ZEBRA v. SCH. DIST. OF THE CITY OF PGH.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Kline Township School District v. McAlooseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Reading School District v. Consumers' Gas Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1922
- Zebra v. School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972