Zebra v. School District
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Judge Rogers:
I dissent because I am unable to agree with my brothers in the majority that the order entered by the chancellor was a proper exercise of discretion or conformable to law. This is not to say that the action of the parents of any child subjected to assaults, threats and indignities, in withdrawing his child from Knoxville *653Junior High School was not proper. It was. However, these parents were not confronted with the enforced attendance of their children at Knoxville when they brought this action or when this prelirainary injunction was issued. It is true that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States Ex Rel. Greathouse v. DernSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hibbs v. ArensbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Chester School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.