Legal Opinion
(SS) Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 20, 2019No. 2:16-cv-01651Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID PAUL HILL, No. 2:16-CV-1651-TLN-CMK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff David Paul Hill’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for 19 Attorney’s Fees, Costs, and Expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 20 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (ECF No. 33.) Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) filed 21 an opposition to the Motion, (ECF No. 34), and Plaintiff submitted a reply (ECF No. 35.) For the 22…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Trevizo v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Saluja Thangaraja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Richard H. Hatch, Jr. v. Department for Children, Youth and Their Families (State of Rhode Island), Steven Brown and Mary McKee ProposedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.