Village of Green Lake v. Ostrander
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrow ni-i art, J.
The claim is founded on sec. 49.10, Stats., which is to the effect that if any person who has received relief at public charge, as an inmate of any state or municipal institution, was at the time of receiving such relief the owner of property, the authorities charged with his care “may sue for and collect the value of the same against such person and against his estate.”
The question before this court is one of interpretation of the statute. It is claimed on the part of the appellant that the statute should be construed to charge the property which the incompetent person had at the time the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Allen v. Department of Mental HygieneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- State Department of Public Welfare v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
- Estate of Pelishek v. East Wisconsin Trustee Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Estate of PhippsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Monroe County v. MooneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.