Legal Opinion
United States v. 79.20 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Stoddard County, Missouri Ladell Norman and Unknown Owners (Tract No. 130)
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 6, 1983No. 82-1859PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals from a judgment awarding Boyd and Evelyn Crowell $29,900 as just compensation for the fee-simple taking of their 11.8-acre tract of land. The government contends that the trial court erred when (1) it excluded evidence of the value of the government’s easement on the land and admitted an appraisal which disregarded the easement; (2) it allowed the landowners’ expert witness to testify as to the cost of replacing a well for which the government had already reimbursed the landowners; (3) it allowed testimony of damages occurring after the taking…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. SowardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Old Dominion Land Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Through DOTD v. Chambers Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Drysdale v. WoerthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re BryantUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010
- Equitrans, L.P. v. 0.56 Acres More or Less of Permanent EasementDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2015
- Continental Resources, Inc. v. Rick FisherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.