Legal Opinion

In re Hammer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appt.icattoN for a writ of certiorari.'

1Opinion of the Court

Per Ouriam:.

Habeas corpus proceedings were brought by the petitioner, Hammer, before the Honorable Michael Kir-WAN, circuit judge of the Fourth circuit, and upon hearing thereof the petitioner was remanded to the county jail. Thereupon the petitioner applied to this court for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the circuit judge. The application must be denied. A common-law writ of certiorari will not issue where there is an adequate remedy by appeal or otherwisa State ex rel. C. & N. W. R. Co. v. Oshkosh, A. & B. W. R. Co. 100 Wis. 538. In the present case, while there is no remedy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Oshkosh, Algoma & Black Wolf RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. BrownellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gaster v. WhitcherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Potter v. FrohbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Longstaff v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State v. RoachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State ex rel. Grant v. Circuit Court of Waukesha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API