Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1910No. 16,255PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Clark district court; Gordon L. Finley, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

This action is for damages for the death of the plaintiff’s husband, who was a brakeman in the service of the defendant railway company. In order to set out a freight car at a switch while the train was moving Mr. Duncan stood on the stirrup near a corner of the car next behind the one that was to be set out, grasping the handhold with one hand, and reached down to or toward the lever of the coupling appliance at the end of the car with the other hand. This was the usual way of uncoupling and setting out a car from a moving train, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Diel v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Hart v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. RhoadesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Brown v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  2. State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  3. Byland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Farmers Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Duncan v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API