Legal Opinion

United States v. Tuck

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 28, 1989No. ACMR 8800969PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HOLDAWAY, Chief Judge:

The appellant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of conspiracy to distribute lysergic acid diethylamide, distribution of methamphetamine, use of methamphetamine, and dereliction of duty. He was sentenced by the military judge to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 15 months, forfeiture of $400.00 per month for 15 months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved the sentence.

One error raised by the appellant merits discussion. The conspiracy involved one coconspirator. During the providence inquiry it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. Garcia v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. United States v. GarciaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. ValiguraCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  3. United States v. ValiguraArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  4. United States v. JilesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  5. United States v. ValiguraCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API