Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 10, 1999No. 98-429PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Michael Anthony Bennett appeals an order which denied a motion brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 in which he challenged the imposition of consecutive habitual offender sentences. We reverse.

The trial court denied the motion as untimely, citing State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla. 1995). Callaway held that claims pursuant to Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993) must be brought within the two year period following the Hale decision. After the order of the trial court, and while this appeal was pending, the Florida Supreme Court decided Dixon v. State, 24 Fla. L.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. State v. CallawaySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API