Legal Opinion

Palmetto Lumber Co. v. Gibbs

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1935No. Motions Nos. 11876-11878; No. 6356PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRITZ, Judge.

This case is again before us on three motions filed by plaintiffs in error as follows:

Motion No. 11876 for rehearing filed by Palmetto Lumber Company, A. C. Ford, R. W. Miller, and A. L. Black. ■

Motion No. 11877 for rehearing filed by A. C. Ford, R. W. Miller, and A. L. Black.

Motion No. 11878 to correct certain statements made in our original opinion, filed by all of the above-named plaintiffs in error.

In our original opinion we stated that the •consideration for the deed of date October 3, 1907, was entirely usurious interest in the sum of $47,643.75. In the motion to correct it…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Temple Trust Co. v. HaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Thompson v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Greever v. PerskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Ames v. Texas Gulf Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Finn v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API