Legal Opinion

Farber v. Howell

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1986No. 15724PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Robert and Carol Farber commenced suit in 1979 to recover a deficiency judgment from William and Mary Howell following a foreclosure of a deed of trust and trustee’s sale of two parcels of land. A default judgment was entered against the Howells. On an appeal by the Howells, the Supreme Court ordered that the default judgment be set aside. 1 When the case was returned to the trial court, the Howells disputed the claim for a deficiency in any amount. The parties could not agree as to the fair market value of the property at the time of the trustee’s sale. Evidence was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Graham v. Larry Donohoe LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Conner v. DakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Price v. Aztec Limited, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Cheney v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Board of County Commissioners for Ada CountyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Excel Leasing Co. v. ChristensenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Hooper v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Wilhelm v. JohnstonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. First National Bank v. BurgessIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API