Legal Opinion

Conner v. Dake

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1982No. 13888PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

In the proceedings below, judgment was entered against the appellants, and included an award of attorney fees under I.C. § 12-121. The only issue raised by appellants on this appeal is whether the court below erred in awarding attorney fees against them.

I.R.C.P. 54(e)(6) states that “[a]ny objection to the allowance of attorney fees, or to the amount thereof, shall be made in the same manner as an objection to costs as provided by Rule 54(d)(6).” I.R.C.P. 54(d)(6) provides that “[a]ny party may object to the claimed costs of another party set forth in a memorandum of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. DeWils Interiors, Inc. v. DinesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Allstate Insurance v. MocabyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Operating Engineers Local Union 370 v. Goodwin Construction Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Medical Recovery Svcs v. Penny R. SilerIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Fearless Farris Wholesale, Inc. v. HowellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API