Hodges v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by Joe Hodges, who was defendant in the trial court, from a judgment in the district court of Tulsa county, in favor of Edward Reynolds for damages arising out of the conversion of personal property. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
1. The first contention argued in the brief of defendant, Joe Hodges, is that the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s two motions to make plaintiff’s petition more definite and certain. The plaintiff alleged in part that he had entered into an oral contract with the defendant for the transportation and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Griffin Grocery Co. v. ScrogginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- First National Bank of Enid v. YeomanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Waters v. DoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- Century Ins. Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Renegar v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- City of Haileyville v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Brazelton's Wholesale Cleaners & Dyers v. CashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Leal v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.