Redd v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Judith Redd underwent a hip replacement using a prosthesis manufactured by defendant DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Approximately four years later, the replacement failed and Redd was diagnosed with a broken femoral component (stem) of her prosthesis. Redd has sued DePuy, alleging that the failure was caused by the prosthesis’s defects and De-Puy’s failure to warn of the risks. She brings four state common law claims under negligence and strict liability theories.
This action is now before me on DePuy’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Luther Stanley v. Cottrell Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Chole v. Boston Scientific CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- Erie Insurance Company v. Weiman Products LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Hagerman v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021
- Sahm v. Allegheny Technologies Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.