Legal Opinion
Fru-Con/Fluor Daniel Joint Venture v. Corrigan Bros., Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 19, 2004No. ED 82587PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherri B. Sullivan, J.
Introduction
The Fru-Con/Fluor Daniel Joint Venture (“the Joint Venture”) appeals from the trial court’s Amended Judgment entered after a bench trial awarding a net judgment in favor of Corrigan Brothers, Inc., d/b/a Corrigan Company Mechanical Contractors (“Corrigan”) in the amount of $2,497,063.50. Corrigan cross-appeals.
Factual and Procedural Background 1
The Procter and Gamble Paper Products Company (“Procter and Gamble”) hired the Joint Venture as the general contractor to build a $485 million paper products manufacturing facility in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri (the “Project”). During…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Schwartz v. Shelby Construction CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Curators of the University of Missouri Ex Rel. Shell-Con, Inc. v. Nebraska Prestressed Concrete Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Investors Title Co. v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Dominion Home Owners Ass'n v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Axenics, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Damon Pursell Construction Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- CADCO, INC. v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Grau Contracting, Inc. v. Captiva Lake Investments, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- GRAU CONTRACTING, INC. v. CAPTIVA LAKE INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, MISSOURI BUILDERS SERVICE, INC., Respondent/Cross-Appellant, QUESTEC CONTRUCTORS, INC., BUTLER SUPPLY, INC., HOUSE OF CARPET, INC., and MEYER ELECTRIC CO., INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.