Legal Opinion

RGS, Cardox Recovery, Inc. v. Dorchester Enhanced Recovery Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided October 31, 1985No. 13-85-066-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in an action for interpretation or reformation of the terms of a joint venture agreement. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The disputed language within paragraph 9.2 of the Joint Venture Agreement, entitled Management Committee, provides in part: “No Management Committee meeting may be held or action taken unless voting members representing aggregate venture percentages of at least seventy-five percent (75%) are present and voting, and all decisions except as otherwise herein provided shall be by majority vote....”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Stone v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Capitol Rod & Gun Club v. Lower Colorado River AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Alkas v. United Sav. Ass'n of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Miller Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Keenan v. Gibraltar Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Hofland v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
  4. Preston Ridge Financial Services Corp. v. Tyler, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Derr Construction Co. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API