Legal Opinion
Agnew v. Hotchkiss
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.
The opinion of the trial court so aptly and’ concisely disposes of the main issues that we adopt it as our own. It says:
“ ‘Highways are only to be laid out when the public good will therebj'- be promoted. Private considerations or inducements cannot rightfy enter into the question in any degree.’ State ex rel. Dosch v. Ryan, 127 Wis. 599, 601, 106 N. W. 1093. It is immaterial whether such inducements be the building of bridges or the voting of bonds by persons who are interested in the location or improvement of a particular road. The controlling factor must always be the good of the general…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Dosch v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stefan Auto Body v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Town of Ashwaubenon v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Nelson Et Ux. v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Tomlin v. Town of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Koshkonong Mud Creek Drainage District v. BodemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.