Legal Opinion
Riter v. Moss & Bloomberg, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 24, 1996No. 96 C 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge:
Before the court is Defendant Moss & Bloomberg’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiffs David and Kathy Riter (“Riters”). The only issue relevant to this motion is whether condominium association fees are “debt” for purposes of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-16920 (1988 & Supp. V) (“FDCPA”).
The Riters filed their Complaint alleging that Defendant violated certain provisions of the FDCPA in the process of collecting condominium fees. The Riters assert that this court has subject matter jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Tommie E. Watkins v. Donald Blinzinger, Dorothy Davis v. Gregory ColerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- In the Matter of William N. Rosteck and Joyce M. Rosteck, Debtors. Appeal of Old Willow Falls Condominium AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Azar v. HayterDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1995
- Davis v. ColerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Terrence Newman and Michelle Newman v. Boehm, Pearlstein & Bright, Limited, David J. Riter and Kathy Riter v. Moss & Bloomberg, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Thies v. Law Offices of William A. WymanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1997
- Bryan v. ClaytonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Keauhou Master Homeowners Ass'n v. County of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 2004