Legal Opinion
Azar v. Hayter
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided January 23, 1995No. GCA 94-10028-MMPPublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
PAUL, Chief Judge.
This cause is before the Court upon the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation dated December 9, 1994. All parties have been furnished copies of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed by the parties, the Court has determined that the recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Communications Workers of America v. BeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aaron Fox Toni Fox, Husband and Wife v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation Jerold Kaplan Jane Doe Kaplan, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Chaudhry v. GallerizzoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- James W. Adair v. Michael L. Sherman and Sherman & ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Michael G. Schroyer Gail R. Schroyer v. Kenneth P. Frankel Gerald M. Smith Company, L.P.A., D/B/A Smith & SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Reid v. AyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Terrence Newman and Michelle Newman v. Boehm, Pearlstein & Bright, Limited, David J. Riter and Kathy Riter v. Moss & Bloomberg, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.