McNeil v. First Congregational Soc'y of S.F.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
-Ejectment, to recover an undivided interest in a portion of fifty-vara lot No. 145, in the city and county of San Francisco.
From the unchallenged findings of the court, it appears that William Paty, on the 13th of November, 1849, acquired title to an undivided interest in the premises in dispute. After his acquisition of title he died, on the 14th of February, 1850, in the city of San Francisco, intestate, and leaving surviving him as his legal heirs, Martha Ann Paty, his widow, and three children, Ellen D., Charles M., and Francis W. Paty. Of these children, Charles M. died in the year…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brenham v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Wilson v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Smith v. YuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Downer v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Harlan v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wood v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- In re Estate of PackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In Re Guardianship of JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Ganahl v. SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Kersey v. McDougalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.