Bragg v. State

1. The court did not abuse its discretion in overruling the motion to continue this case.

2. Even should it be conceded that the evidence incorporated in the second ground of the motion for a new trial was improperly admitted, it is of such little probative value that the error does not require the grant of a new trial. Adams v. State, 27 Ga. App. 48 (2) (107 S. E. 388). Indeed, in the brief of counsel for plaintiff, in error he admits that this evidence “may not of itself be sufficient ground for a new trial.”

3. “Where a motion is made to exclude certain testimony in its entirety, some of…