Legal Opinion

People v. Nikolich

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1928No. Docket No. 1676PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

The defendant and appellant. L. Nikolich, together with the defendant George T. Vidieli, was convicted of possessing a still, used and intended to be used in the manufacture and production of intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes. Nikolich prosecutes this appeal from the judgment pronounced upon the verdict of the jury finding him guilty.

The sole ground relied upon by appellant for a reversal of the judgment is that the testimony, aside from that of his accomplice Vidich, is insufficient. Unquestionably the testimony of Vidich is sufficient to fasten the offense upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. DemeraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. People v. TinninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. ReingoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. State v. MundellIdaho Supreme Court · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API