Legal Opinion
Blythe v. Cordingly
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1905No. 2413PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
The complaint named “Alfred Cordingly and Abraham Goodstein, late copartners under the firm name of Cordingly & Goodstein,” as defendants.
It alleged eight canses of action. The first seven were based npon promissory notes alleged to have been made by the defendants “under their firm name of Cordingly & Goodstein.”
The eighth canse of action alleged the execntion by “the firm of Cordingly & Goodstein” of six promissory notes identical in terms with those alleged in the first six canses of action; that snch promissory notes were endorsed by their respective payees to Fannie Goodstein and Millie…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sessions v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Exchange Bank v. FordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- Craig v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Jansen v. GrimshawIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Dessauer v. KoppinColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sayre Commission Co. v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Denver National Bank v. GrimesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
- Tripp v. PargaColorado Court of Appeals · 1988