Legal Opinion

Exchange Bank v. Ford

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1884PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to District Court of Arapahoe County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.

This action was brought to collect a partnership debt. At common law partners are held to be jointly liable for the firm debts. While each is bound for *315the whole indebtedness, and while a judgment might be recovered, under some circumstances, in an action at law against one of the partners, yet the liability is regarded as joint only, and not as joint and several.

At common law, therefore, the doctrine of merger, contended for by defendant in error, who was defendant below, would undoubtedly govern this cáse; and he could plead the judgment rendered against his co-defendants in bar of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crain v. FoxNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Gage v. Mechanics' National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Strong v. WheatonNew York Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fillmore v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Danielson v. GudeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  3. Enyeart v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Jones v. LanghorneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  5. Dessauer v. KoppinColorado Court of Appeals · 1893

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API