Legal Opinion
United States v. Wayland
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 3, 2008No. 08-2194PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
A jury found Ronald E. Wayland guilty of making false statements relating to health care matters, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1035(a)(2), 24(b). At sentencing, the district court concluded that Mr. Wayland used “sophisticated means” to perpetrate the fraud and, accordingly, applied a two-level upward adjustment to his offense level, see U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(9). The district court sentenced Mr. Wayland to 41 months’ imprisonment; Mr. Wayland filed a timely notice of appeal. Because the district court did not clearly err in determining that Mr. Wayland used sophisticated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Ephraim LewisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. James Rinaldo JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. HanceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Randall A. Rettenberger and Julie L. RettenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. James Fife and Karen KrahnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. GhertlerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Harriet JinwrightCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.