Legal Opinion

Sims v. Carter

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeHaven

Complainant, ft. B. Sims, Jr., conducts a produce business in the City of Memphis, and paid the privilege tax required of “Produce Dealers” by Item 76, article 2, section 1, of the General Revenue Bill of 1937, Pub. Acts 1937, ch. 108, for the period from April 1, 1937, to April 1, 1938. Thereafter, for the same period of time, because he dressed poultry and sold the same at wholesale, the State exacted of him the privilege tax required of ‘ ‘ Wholesale Butchers ’ ’ by Item 16 of the Revenue Bill. Complainant paid the tax demanded, under protest, and sues in this cause to recover the amount…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Life & Accident Ins. v. DempsterTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Price-Bass Co. v. McCabeTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. J. H. Allison & Co. v. KilloughTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Mengel Box Co. v. StevensTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Frank v. LindseyTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Murfreesboro Bank & Trust Co. v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. CobbTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Murdock Acceptance Corp. v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API