Bute v. Illinois
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Mr. Justice Douglas,
with whom
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Rutledge concur, dissenting.
In considering cases like this and the ill-starred decision in Betts v. Brady,1 316 U. S. 455, we should ask ourselves *678this question: Of what value is the constitutional guaranty of a fair trial if an accused does not have counsel to advise and defend him?
The Framers deemed the right of counsel indispensable, for they wrote into the Sixth Amendment that in all criminal prosecutions the accused “shall enjoy the right . . . to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” Hence, if…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Adamson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Williams v. KaiserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.