State v. Kidder
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
The Hillsborough District Court (Hatfield, J.) certified the following question pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 9:
Does the defendant in this case, who is subject to a protective order issued by the District Court which prohibits third party contact with the victim by telephone, violate the order when the defendant’s attorney, a member of the New Hampshire Bar in good standing, contacts the unrepresented protected person on behalf of the defendant?
For the reasons explained below, we answer this question affirmatively and remand.
The district court, following offers of proof and submission of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. AlbersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- In re WatterworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McNair v. McNairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Grand China, Inc. v. United National InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- In re BergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Hemenway v. HemenwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. CraigSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.