Shuck v. Means
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Justice.
One of these actions was brought by Carol L. Shuck to recover for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident involving a vehicle owned by defendant Hertz Rent-A-Car and driven by defendant David Means, age 18. A second action was brought by United Services Automobile Association for declaratory judgment that an insurance policy it had issued to Means’ father did not provide coverage for David Means, who in turn filed a third-party complaint for a declaratory judgment that, if no coverage existed under the United Services policy, a policy issued to Hertz by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Susco Car Rental System of Florida v. LeonardSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Kerns v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Lynch v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- Foster v. BockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Hutchings v. BourdagesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cates v. CreamerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Boatwright v. BudakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Meyer v. NwokediSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Ewers v. Thunderbird Aviation, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Reliance Insurance Co. v. StackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.