Runkle v. Lemmon
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County
1Opinion of the Court
BUCKINGHAM, J.,
Plaintiff sued defendant for the support of a non-marital child. Defendant denied paternity and alleged that *174one Danny Walls was the father of the child. Plaintiff then filed a petition requesting Walls be required to undergo a Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) Blood Tissue typing test. Walls resists the motion. We hold that plaintiff is entitled to the test.
A paternity action arising out of a support proceeding is a collateral step to enforce a duty of support and is, therefore, in the instant case, in the nature of a support action. Actions for support are governed by Pa.R.C.P.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Huntingdon v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- McGarrity v. MengelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Foster v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Thompson v. ScavoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959