Legal Opinion

Runkle v. Lemmon

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County

Decided March 22, 1984No. 1241 of 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

BUCKINGHAM, J.,

Plaintiff sued defendant for the support of a non-marital child. Defendant denied paternity and alleged that *174one Danny Walls was the father of the child. Plaintiff then filed a petition requesting Walls be required to undergo a Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) Blood Tissue typing test. Walls resists the motion. We hold that plaintiff is entitled to the test.

A paternity action arising out of a support proceeding is a collateral step to enforce a duty of support and is, therefore, in the instant case, in the nature of a support action. Actions for support are governed by Pa.R.C.P.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Huntingdon v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. McGarrity v. MengelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Foster v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Thompson v. ScavoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API