Legal Opinion
Nickel v. Zeitz
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 10, 1927PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The case is here on an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the second, third and fourth counts of the amended declaration. The declaration is based upon an agreement and a supplemental agreement, both in writing, for the laundering by the plaintiff of certain articles; the first count, for laundering certain underwear and flannel shirts; the second for laundering approximately two hundred five thousand nine hundred seventy-five leather jerkins; the third, for laundering approximately eight hundred two bales of puttees; and the fourth, for laundering approximately two hundred…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stoops v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Hobbs v. Massasoit Whip Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Safford v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Fullam v. Wright & Colton Wire Cloth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. WheatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Simons v. American Dry Ginger Ale Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Muir Brothers Co. v. Sawyer Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Carrig v. Gilbert-Varker Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Bianchi Bros. v. GendronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Greany v. McCormickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.