Legal Opinion
Hoesl v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 26, 1978No. C-77-0948-CBRPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
RENFREW, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action against the United States and Dr. David Allen Kasuboski under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680. Only the United States was served. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b).
On December 22, 1977, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. After both sides briefed their positions, the Court heard oral argument on January 12, 1978. In a letter dated January 17, 1978,…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bratt v. International Business MacHines Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- P. Brian Brumfield v. Sherri Sanders Michelle Shadday Brenda Derr-Blakeney M. Jane Huff Carla Meyers United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Octavio Jimenez-Nieves v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- James v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1980
- Noel v. River Hills Wilsons, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.