Legal Opinion

June v. School District No. 11

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1938No. Docket No. 122, Calendar No. 39,838PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

Plaintiff, a school teacher, brought suit against defendant school district claiming damages resulting from breach of contract. On March 1, 1933, plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant whereby she agreed to teach during the years 1933 to 1936, inclusive, at the rate of $2,300 a year.

She taught from September, 1933, to January, 1935, when she was summarily discharged by the school board which, at that time, was in arrears in payment of her salary in the amount of $1,800.

Defendant claims that the contract is void because it does not comply with provisions of Act No. 19, § 22a, Pub.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Contested Election of CusickLackawanna County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1890
  3. Gwitt v. FossMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Attorney General ex rel. Common Council v. MarxMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Rapid Railway Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Miller v. Palo Alto Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. RamosMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In the Matter of James E. Bennett, Bankrupt, Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit v. Donald W. Kreling, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  5. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. MuzeckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API