Legal Opinion

Borth v. Borth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1977No. 48,091Published

1Opinion of the Court

221 Kan. 494 (1977)

561 P.2d 408

DANIEL J. BORTH, Appellee,

v.

CLARK BORTH, Appellant.

No. 48,091

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed March 5, 1977.

Raymond L. Dahlberg, of Turner and Hensley, Chartered, of Great Bend, argued the cause, and Lee Turner, of the same firm, was with him on the brief for the appellant.

Jack O. Bowker, of MacDonald & Bowker, of McPherson, argued the cause, and Tyrus C. Kaufman, of the same firm, was with him on the brief for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MILLER, J.:

This is a civil action for damages based upon a claim of personal injuries…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. AuerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Bott v. WendlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Casey v. Phillips Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Smith v. Blakey, AdministratorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Kleppe v. PrawlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API