Katz v. Johnston
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 28, Oct. T., 1896, by-defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny County, Jan. Term, 1896, No. 187, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for an account and for an injunction. White, J., filed the following opinion: On the 28th day of March, 1893, the plaintiff and defendant bought from W. J. Dible and J. E. Hunter a piece of ground in Turtle Creek, this county, containing about one acre, and the deed was executed to them of that date.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 28, Oct. T., 1896, by-defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny County, Jan. Term, 1896, No. 187, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for an account and for an injunction. White, J., filed the following opinion: On the 28th day of March, 1893, the plaintiff and defendant bought from W. J. Dible and J. E. Hunter a piece of ground in Turtle Creek, this county, containing about one acre, and the deed was executed to them of that date. The deed is to them as joint tenants. The consideration specified in the deed is $5,500; to be paid, $2,500 cash, and the purchasers to assume the…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Ctjriam,
We find no error in the proceedings leading up to the decree from which this appeal was taken, nor in the decree itself. The findings of fact were amply warranted by the pleadings and proofs; and the conclusions drawn from the facts thus established appear to be substantially correct. On these findings and legal conclusions of the court below, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs, to be paid by appellant.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Yeaney v. KeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- General Atlantic S. S. Corp. v. ButterworthDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949