Legal Opinion

Chad Creel v. Rob Bonta, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 9, 2026No. 2:26-cv-02111Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAD CREEL, Case No. 2:26-cv-02111-DC-CSK (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ROB BONTA, et al., (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Chad Creel’s motion to proceed in forma 18 pauperis (“IFP”), motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”), and request for 19 disability accommodations. (ECF Nos. 2, 3, 4).1 Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the Court 20 submits the motions upon the record and briefs on file. 21 For the reasons…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API