Legal Opinion

James v. City of Worcester

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 31, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

The defendant, under authority from the Legislature, built a dam and maintained a reservoir for the *362purpose of supplying its inhabitants with water.* This action is brought to recover for damages to the plaintiff’s land by water which escaped from the reservoir in consequence of the giving way of the dam. The land was subject to a mortgage, and the defendant settled with the mortgagee for all the damages, and received a discharge in full from him.

The first question is, whether the settlement by the mortgagee is a defence to this suit by the mortgagor.

In general, the mortgagee of land is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gooding v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Searle v. SawyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Byrom v. ChapinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. Farnsworth v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Wilbur v. MoultonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Delano v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Everett v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Morris Plan Co. v. Hillcrest Farms Dairy, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Rockwood v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API