Legal Opinion

Louisville Marine & Fire Insurance v. Bland

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 27, 1839PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Covenant. From the Circuit Court tor Jefferson County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the Opinion of the Court in this case, at the last Spring Term; but the decision was afterwards suspended, and the Opinion having been since re-considered and somewhat modified, is now made final, as follows:—

This action of covenant was brought to recover for a partial loss, upon a policy of insurance, executed by the Louisville Marine and Fire Insurance Company.

The policy purports to insure Messrs. Bland and Coleman, in the sum of one thousand eight hundred and sixty five dollars and forty-nine cents, upon sundries (stated in the margin) lost or not lost, shipped or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Biays v. Chesapeake InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Deidericks v. Commercial InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1813

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chicago Ins. Co. v. Graham & Morton Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  2. Knutzen v. National Live Stock InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Silloway v. Neptune InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1858
  4. Pierce v. Columbian InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API