Legal Opinion

Knutzen v. National Live Stock Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1909No. Nos. 16,204—(74)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action in the municipal court of St. Paul against defendant company on its policy of insurance to recover $150 for loss on account of the death of a certain gelding. From an order, Finehout, J., overruling a demurrer to the second amended complaint, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Appeal from an order overruling defendant’s general demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendant is a live stock insurance corporation, and as such issued to plaintiff on August 15, 1907, a policy of insurance by which plaintiff was insured against loss by death, from disease or accident, of the animals therein mentioned. It also alleged a compliance by plaintiff with all the terms and conditions imposed upon him by the contract, and that a certain gelding, named “Tom,” was included in and covered by the policy. It then alleges that “on *164the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lund v. RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
  2. Newman v. Railway Officials & Employees' Accident Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Louisville Marine & Fire Insurance v. BlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839
  4. Weltin v. Union Marine InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Penhall v. Minnesota State Medical Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API