Legal Opinion

People v. Van Vorce

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1927No. Docket No. 93PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Defendant was convicted in the Washtenaw circuit court for having in his possession certain intoxicating liquors. The liquors were secured by means of a search warrant. A motion was duly made to suppress the evidence obtained by the search warrant, on the ground that the search warrant was invalid. The motion- was not heard, and defendant was forced to trial before the motion could be heard under the rule, and he thereby lost the benefit of this defense.

1. The principal ground of the motion to suppress was that the search warrant was invalid because it did not contain all the material facts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SwetlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. MotenMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People v. VickMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. ZabijakMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. People v. SerraMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. In Re BrazelMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. People v. O'DELLMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API