Legal Opinion

American and Foreign Ins. v. Tee Jays

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 18, 1997No. 1951931PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

American and Foreign Insurance Company ("A F") appeals from a partial summary judgment entered in favor of Tee Jays Manufacturing Company, Inc., and Tee Jays Holding Corporation (collectively "Tee Jays"), on Tee Jays' claim for benefits for a claimed business income loss, under an insurance policy it had bought from A F.1 We affirm.

I

In October 1993, A F issued to Tee Jays an insurance policy entitled "Business Protection Portfolio." The policy read, in pertinent part:

"COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COVERAGE PART
"ROYAL FLEX COVERAGE
". . . .
"IN RETURN FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE PREMIUM, AND SUBJECT TO ALL THE…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Liberty Ins. Co. of Birmingham v. LeonardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Home Indem. Co. v. EMPLOYERS NAT. INS. CORP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. TWIN CITY FIRE INS. COMPANY v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  3. Mega Life & Health Insurance v. Pieniozek Ex Rel. Estate of PieniozekCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  4. McKinney v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. National Security Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API