Legal Opinion
Ripley v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 7, 2024No. 8:23-cv-02617Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND EDNA RIPLEY, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civ. No. DLB-23-2617 PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT * UNION, et al. Defendants. * MEMORANDUM OPINION Edna Ripley, who is proceeding without counsel, alleges Pentagon Federal Credit Union (“PenFed”) and PAR, Inc. (“PAR”) repossessed her vehicle in violation of federal law. ECF 1. The defendants have moved to dismiss Ripley’s complaint for failure to state a claim. ECF 20. The matter is fully briefed. ECF 25, 27, 28. A hearing is not necessary. See Loc. R. 105.6. For the following reasons, the Court…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.