Legal Opinion

Scurlock v. Wingate

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 12, 1926No. 1390PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Quinn, J.

This is a stock law election contest. The case was tried before the court without a jury and judgment rendered declaring the election void. The case is before us on appeal.

The record contains the following findings of fact and conclusions of law- by the court:

“Conclusions of Pacts.'
“I find the facts in the above entitled and numbered cause to be as follows:
“An election was held in drainage district No. 3, of Jefferson county, Tex., at Hampshire on May 24, 1924, for the purpose of determining whether horses, cattle, jacks, and jennets should be permitted to run at large within the territorial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fowler v. State ex rel. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. McKinney v. O'ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Wallis v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Altgelt v. CallaghanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Bell v. FaulknerTexas Supreme Court · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Orth v. BenavidesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Tate v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Shrader v. RitcheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Common School Dist. No. 22 v. Farmers & Bankers Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API